Monday, August 02, 2004
Sacrifice and NFP
Reminding me that I didn't write my article on Eucharistic fasting yet.
Fr. Hogan, I believe what is missing from many of these posts on the intent of NFP being the same as other methods is the notion of sacrifice.
1 - I don't believe the intent NOT to have children is evil in itself, and is perfectly fine in many circumstances.
2. The Method does make all the difference in the world. I can either punish my child by beating them, or making them forego something they enjoy. The intent is the same, however, the method of getting there is quite different.
One of the major difference between barrier, pill and the rest of these contraceptives, is that there is no sacrifice involved. There certainly is with NFP, and it can be difficult. If this suffering is endured for the sake of Christ, and the love of His Church's teaching, is there no merit to it?
Tanquerey stated "In Heaven we shall love without any need of self-immolation. Here on earth it is quite otherwise. In our present state of fallen nature, it is impossible for us to love God truly and effectively without sacrificing ourselves for Him."
And if the Church is wrong on this issue, how is it that it is right about every other one?
Occasionally, a bit of faith is involved, and is not too much to ask.
Thanks and God Bless Kevin
Fr. Hogan, I believe what is missing from many of these posts on the intent of NFP being the same as other methods is the notion of sacrifice.
1 - I don't believe the intent NOT to have children is evil in itself, and is perfectly fine in many circumstances.
2. The Method does make all the difference in the world. I can either punish my child by beating them, or making them forego something they enjoy. The intent is the same, however, the method of getting there is quite different.
One of the major difference between barrier, pill and the rest of these contraceptives, is that there is no sacrifice involved. There certainly is with NFP, and it can be difficult. If this suffering is endured for the sake of Christ, and the love of His Church's teaching, is there no merit to it?
Tanquerey stated "In Heaven we shall love without any need of self-immolation. Here on earth it is quite otherwise. In our present state of fallen nature, it is impossible for us to love God truly and effectively without sacrificing ourselves for Him."
And if the Church is wrong on this issue, how is it that it is right about every other one?
Occasionally, a bit of faith is involved, and is not too much to ask.
Thanks and God Bless Kevin
