Monday, June 14, 2004
My only question is, is this is there good logic or bad logic in the decision?
Here's some nice news to start the week off with.
REFERENCE TO DIVINE TO STAY IN PLEDGE
The Supreme Court just ruled -- last hour -- that a California
atheist has no legal right to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from his
daughter's school and others nationwide because he did not have
legal authority to speak for the child.
Remember, the kid is living with her mother.
But there's always a but the High Court in its ruling avoided
weighing in on general church-state issues.
You read it here first, folks!
Ill put up the full story on the front page --
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/ -- as soon as I get the details.
And now back to your regularly scheduled programming already in
progress
Binyamin L. Jolkovsky
Editor in Chief
JewishWorldReview.com
REFERENCE TO DIVINE TO STAY IN PLEDGE
The Supreme Court just ruled -- last hour -- that a California
atheist has no legal right to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from his
daughter's school and others nationwide because he did not have
legal authority to speak for the child.
Remember, the kid is living with her mother.
But there's always a but the High Court in its ruling avoided
weighing in on general church-state issues.
You read it here first, folks!
Ill put up the full story on the front page --
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/ -- as soon as I get the details.
And now back to your regularly scheduled programming already in
progress
Binyamin L. Jolkovsky
Editor in Chief
JewishWorldReview.com
