Tuesday, May 18, 2004
Legalese
It is, by the way, within the power of the President
to end abortion tomorrow, as I would do my first day
in office. Don't let alleged "pro-life" Presidents
tell you differently. The President has an obligation
under Article IV, §4 to ensure to each member State
that it will be republican in form of government. Any
action that is not republican in form will be utterly
resisted to the grave if necessary under a Peroutka
Presidency. Abortion was made "legal" (more
correctly, the prosecution of abortion was made
illegal) in these United States by judicial fiat,
which is anti-republican in form and in violation of
the Separation of Powers and Article I, §1 of the
Constitution vesting all legislative power of the
Federal Government in the Congress. In an American
form of government, "all laws which are repugnant to
the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v.
Madison. Most certainly, anti-Constitutional court
decisions are not binding.
He does have a good point. One of the things that the Founding Fathers were big on was that the courts must have absolutely no way to enforce their decisions, because they are so unaccountable to anyone and have ops sine fine, power and might without limit. I don't know if this "works" though, or what the consequences would be, but it's fascinating.
to end abortion tomorrow, as I would do my first day
in office. Don't let alleged "pro-life" Presidents
tell you differently. The President has an obligation
under Article IV, §4 to ensure to each member State
that it will be republican in form of government. Any
action that is not republican in form will be utterly
resisted to the grave if necessary under a Peroutka
Presidency. Abortion was made "legal" (more
correctly, the prosecution of abortion was made
illegal) in these United States by judicial fiat,
which is anti-republican in form and in violation of
the Separation of Powers and Article I, §1 of the
Constitution vesting all legislative power of the
Federal Government in the Congress. In an American
form of government, "all laws which are repugnant to
the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v.
Madison. Most certainly, anti-Constitutional court
decisions are not binding.
He does have a good point. One of the things that the Founding Fathers were big on was that the courts must have absolutely no way to enforce their decisions, because they are so unaccountable to anyone and have ops sine fine, power and might without limit. I don't know if this "works" though, or what the consequences would be, but it's fascinating.
