Friday, April 16, 2004
MMMMMM gay unborn baby whales
FRIDAY FAX
April 16, 2004
Volume 7, Number 17
Homosexuals Call Barbaric Church Purveyor of Nasty Dogmas
As the drive to establish international homosexual rights has
apparently stalled at the UN Commission on Human Rights now taking place
in Geneva, homosexual advocacy groups have begun lashing out at their
opponents, even calling the Catholic Church barbaric in its defense of
nasty dogmas.
The Commission was supposed to vote on a resolution over whether
sexual orientation should be recognized as an internationally protected
human right, but none of the Commissions 53 member states has yet to
introduce such a resolution. In a major setback to the homosexual lobby,
Brazil, the country that had introduced the resolution last year, declined
to do so again during this session. In a statement released by its UN
mission in Geneva, the Brazilian government said that, Since November
last year, we have been consulting with delegations of several countries
on the text. We have not yet been able, however, to arrive at a necessary
consensus.
This apparent setback has enraged supporters of international
homosexual rights, who have been lobbying worldwide since the resolution
was deferred last year in the face of widespread opposition. Michael
Cashman, a British homosexual activist and member of the European
parliament, blamed the aggressive lobbying of the Vatican and Muslim
countries, such as Egypt, Pakistan and Malaysia, for this years problems,
labeling their cooperation on this issue an unholy axis.
Yup, Muslims love the Church and the Church loves Islam. You know how it is
The Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association (GALHA) has been even
more explicit in its condemnation of the Catholic Church. George
Broadhead, secretary of GALHA, said, the Vatican trumpets itself as a
champion of human rights and a model of compassion. This continued
barbaric contempt for gay people shows that the Vatican is prepared to go
to any lengths to promote its nasty dogmas.
Barbaric contempt for gay people. Perhaps you can point that one out to me in some document or other. The Church says that sodomy is bad news, and it doens't matter if it's a man and his wife getting some anal action or two guys getting it on, but if anything that's a barbaric contempt for sodomy. I can think of a few homo-attracted Catholics I know who would question your statement . . .
Broadhead believes that the Vatican should be punished for its
position, saying, The Vatican has a special status at the United Nations
that is granted to no other religion. It is seeking to gain full status
that would give it even more power to impose its will on an unwilling
world. We call on the United Nations to immediately strip the Vatican of
its observer status. It has shown itself unworthy of having it.
Nota bene. The Vatican is not a religion. The Catholic Church is a religion. It doesn't impose it's will on anyone because the UN is a DEMOCRACY. That means that people propose bills and then THERE ARE VOTES ON THEM. If the world is unwilling the BILL WILL FAIL BY A LARGE MARGIN.
Why is it that the far left always sees any democratic situation as an attempt to impose one's will on an unwilling majority?
Maybe we should just kick out all countries that are like the Church on this issue. Chile? Gone. Egypt? Finished. Australia? Bunch of bums. All theocratic states worthy of the contempt of the UN. Get 'em out before they impose their religiously driven will on others. You disagree with me? That means you shoulnd't be at the UN.
Hehe. Maybe GALHA'll finally get their asses tossed out. Oh wait. It's forbidden that UN members berate UN members on the floor. But NGOs can do whatever they want because they're "right". Sorry.
Wait. Humanism is a religion. How come they're trying to impose their religious beliefs on an unwilling world?
Although pro-family observers are heartened by the developments in
Geneva, the Human Rights Commission is scheduled to vote this afternoon on
whether or not to make reference to the controversial recommendations of
Paul Hunt, the Commissions Special Rapporteur on physical and mental
health. These recommendations, first reported in the March 26 Friday Fax,
include calls for the creation of new international sexual rights, such
as broad rights for men who have sex with men, lesbians, transsexual and
bisexual people. If the recommendations are referenced by the Commission,
it is feared that an international law foundation for homosexual rights
could still be created, even without the Brazilian resolution.
Copyright C-FAM (Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute). Permission
granted for unlimited use. Credit required.
[The Friday Fax is reported and written by C-FAM Vice President Douglas A.
Sylva.]
Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 427
New York, New York 10017
Phone: (212) 754-5948 Fax: (212) 754-9291
E-mail: c-fam@c-fam.org Website: www.c-fam.org
April 16, 2004
Volume 7, Number 17
Homosexuals Call Barbaric Church Purveyor of Nasty Dogmas
As the drive to establish international homosexual rights has
apparently stalled at the UN Commission on Human Rights now taking place
in Geneva, homosexual advocacy groups have begun lashing out at their
opponents, even calling the Catholic Church barbaric in its defense of
nasty dogmas.
The Commission was supposed to vote on a resolution over whether
sexual orientation should be recognized as an internationally protected
human right, but none of the Commissions 53 member states has yet to
introduce such a resolution. In a major setback to the homosexual lobby,
Brazil, the country that had introduced the resolution last year, declined
to do so again during this session. In a statement released by its UN
mission in Geneva, the Brazilian government said that, Since November
last year, we have been consulting with delegations of several countries
on the text. We have not yet been able, however, to arrive at a necessary
consensus.
This apparent setback has enraged supporters of international
homosexual rights, who have been lobbying worldwide since the resolution
was deferred last year in the face of widespread opposition. Michael
Cashman, a British homosexual activist and member of the European
parliament, blamed the aggressive lobbying of the Vatican and Muslim
countries, such as Egypt, Pakistan and Malaysia, for this years problems,
labeling their cooperation on this issue an unholy axis.
Yup, Muslims love the Church and the Church loves Islam. You know how it is
The Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association (GALHA) has been even
more explicit in its condemnation of the Catholic Church. George
Broadhead, secretary of GALHA, said, the Vatican trumpets itself as a
champion of human rights and a model of compassion. This continued
barbaric contempt for gay people shows that the Vatican is prepared to go
to any lengths to promote its nasty dogmas.
Barbaric contempt for gay people. Perhaps you can point that one out to me in some document or other. The Church says that sodomy is bad news, and it doens't matter if it's a man and his wife getting some anal action or two guys getting it on, but if anything that's a barbaric contempt for sodomy. I can think of a few homo-attracted Catholics I know who would question your statement . . .
Broadhead believes that the Vatican should be punished for its
position, saying, The Vatican has a special status at the United Nations
that is granted to no other religion. It is seeking to gain full status
that would give it even more power to impose its will on an unwilling
world. We call on the United Nations to immediately strip the Vatican of
its observer status. It has shown itself unworthy of having it.
Nota bene. The Vatican is not a religion. The Catholic Church is a religion. It doesn't impose it's will on anyone because the UN is a DEMOCRACY. That means that people propose bills and then THERE ARE VOTES ON THEM. If the world is unwilling the BILL WILL FAIL BY A LARGE MARGIN.
Why is it that the far left always sees any democratic situation as an attempt to impose one's will on an unwilling majority?
Maybe we should just kick out all countries that are like the Church on this issue. Chile? Gone. Egypt? Finished. Australia? Bunch of bums. All theocratic states worthy of the contempt of the UN. Get 'em out before they impose their religiously driven will on others. You disagree with me? That means you shoulnd't be at the UN.
Hehe. Maybe GALHA'll finally get their asses tossed out. Oh wait. It's forbidden that UN members berate UN members on the floor. But NGOs can do whatever they want because they're "right". Sorry.
Wait. Humanism is a religion. How come they're trying to impose their religious beliefs on an unwilling world?
Although pro-family observers are heartened by the developments in
Geneva, the Human Rights Commission is scheduled to vote this afternoon on
whether or not to make reference to the controversial recommendations of
Paul Hunt, the Commissions Special Rapporteur on physical and mental
health. These recommendations, first reported in the March 26 Friday Fax,
include calls for the creation of new international sexual rights, such
as broad rights for men who have sex with men, lesbians, transsexual and
bisexual people. If the recommendations are referenced by the Commission,
it is feared that an international law foundation for homosexual rights
could still be created, even without the Brazilian resolution.
Copyright C-FAM (Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute). Permission
granted for unlimited use. Credit required.
[The Friday Fax is reported and written by C-FAM Vice President Douglas A.
Sylva.]
Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute
866 United Nations Plaza, Suite 427
New York, New York 10017
Phone: (212) 754-5948 Fax: (212) 754-9291
E-mail: c-fam@c-fam.org Website: www.c-fam.org
